On Tue, 18 Dec 2007 17:14:31 -0600 Federico Mena Quintero <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Back to my original question: should this function be called
> g_format_size_for_display()? It's not for files only.
Can I put in a vote for:
typedef enum {
G_FORMAT_SIZE_BINARY,
G_FORMAT_SIZE_DECIMAL,
G_FORMAT_SIZE_USER, // The user's preference
} gformat_size_type;
gchar *g_format_size_for_display(goffset size, gformat_size_type type);
Then perhaps a simple
gchar *g_format_file_size_for_display(goffset size)
{
return g_format_size_for_display(size, G_FORMAT_SIZE_BINARY);
}
--
Paul "LeoNerd" Evans
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
ICQ# 4135350 | Registered Linux# 179460
http://www.leonerd.org.uk/
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
