> Actually, I meant to do that too, but must have forgotten. > I agree, we should only show bindings up to the version we support > perhaps (is that 2.6 or 2.8? I can't remember). > > This list is not updated by anyone except us though. The problem is > that it will definitely become out of date unless someone actively > checks up on all bindings. That is probably also why the bindings on > there are mostly out of date for a lot of languages.
Speaking as one of the maintainers for the Ada binding, it is up-to-date for gtk+ 2.8, and partially for 2.10. Should I convey this information by some other means to maintainers ? thanks in advance Emmanuel _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
