Emmanuel Briot wrote:
>> Actually, I meant to do that too, but must have forgotten.
>> I agree, we should only show bindings up to the version we support
>> perhaps (is that 2.6 or 2.8? I can't remember).
>>
>> This list is not updated by anyone except us though. The problem is
>> that it will definitely become out of date unless someone actively
>> checks up on all bindings. That is probably also why the bindings on
>> there are mostly out of date for a lot of languages.
>>
>
> Speaking as one of the maintainers for the Ada binding, it is
> up-to-date for gtk+ 2.8, and partially for 2.10. Should I
> convey this information by some other means to maintainers ?
>
Fixed!
Please let me know if there are any other bindings that have the wrong
status (or just fix it directly in svn for those who have a gnome svn
account).
- Andreas
_______________________________________________
gtk-devel-list mailing list
gtk-devel-list@gnome.org
http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
