Hi, On Wed, 2009-09-30 at 11:46 +0200, Alexander Larsson wrote: > On Tue, 2009-09-29 at 22:59 +0200, Mark wrote: > > > hehe that was the idea indeed ^_^ and i will continue with that. > > I will test the large factors tomorrow. > > > > For now i'm happy with 100% cpu usage on all my cores (4). > > with the code posted in my previous message i only had 70% cpu usage > > so there was a bottleneck and it wasn't the HDD nor the CPU. > > Now that's fixed with giving each thread more then one (5 actually) > > images of it's own before locking and refilling the queue of 5 so now > > there is 100% cpu usage in the multi threaded benchmark. > > > > http://codepad.org/PKnp69qW > > Ok, i tested this a bit, and my results are not the same as yours. > > I tested on a directory with 1348 jpeg files, each aroung 5 megapixels, > totalling 3.1 gig of data.
did you try testing with an already thumbnailed directory ? I find Nautilus quite slow in this case (sorry, I'm not at home right now do I can't test), although if I understand correctly there's not much work to do. Xav _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org http://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list