On Wed, 2013-09-11 at 12:10 +0100, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: > hi; > > On 11 September 2013 11:39, Murray Cumming <murr...@murrayc.com> wrote: > > >> This deprecated several classes (GtkIconFactory, GtkIconSet, > >> GtkIconSource, GtkImageMenuItem, GtkAction, GtkUIManager). > > > > It also deprecated GtkRecentAction, because it deprecated the base > > GtkAction. > > as the author of GtkRecentAction, I'm honestly not concerned. > GtkRecentAction was a stop-gap that covered users of the old > EggRecent* API, and was never really useful; in a sense, it was a > class used to paper over a deprecation. shoving a bunch of recently > used files with only the name and a 16 px MIME type icon as a > differentiating feature in a menu (or in a toolbar menu button) always > seemed to me like a very bad UI. the file selection widget has a > better list of recently used files, these days.
OK. That sounds reasonable. Can we make that decision and state it in the gtk-doc deprecation comments, please? > > Deprecation without replacement makes the deprecation less useful to > > application code because it makes it impossible for me to achieve zero > > use of deprecated API. > > I'm not entirely sure that "zero use of deprecated API" is a worthy > goal to achieve immediately after a single release cycle - especially > when it comes to timed releases like the 3.x series has been for the > past 3 years. yes, in the end we obviously want the deprecated API > usage in applications to tend to zero, but "being able to port an > application in the month and a half between API freeze and GTK > release" has never been a requirement for deprecating API. [snip] I don't need to do it immediately after the stable release. I'd like to do it as soon as possible, idally before the next set of deprecations come along, but that gives me 6 months or so, which seems like a worthwhile goal for me. We want deprecations to be useful and would like people to follow their advice. They are more useful when people can temporarily turn on warnings as errors and make sure there are no deprecation warnings left. A warning that can't be solved would make that harder. -- murr...@murrayc.com www.murrayc.com www.openismus.com _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
