On Thu, Oct 10, 2013 at 1:41 AM, Michael Natterer <mi...@gimp.org> wrote: > On 10/10/2013 12:08 AM, Emmanuele Bassi wrote: >> >> On 9 October 2013 23:04, Emmanuele Bassi <eba...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >>>> Bastien, excuse me, but Michael's reference to The GIMP was a hint >>>> that GTK (with or without '+' -- no matter), stands for The GIMP >>>> Toolkit. GIMP, not GNOME. >>>> Proof: http://www.gtk.org/ >> >> >> by the by, this argument would have a bit more weight than zero if >> Gimp actually had a released based on GTK+ 3. > > > GIMP has a GTK+ 3 branch that is constantly kept up to date and if I > remember correctly it took quite a while to do GTK+ 2.24 to prepare > for 3.0. GIMP does exactly the same and finiahes 2.10 first to deprecate > stuff properly before we switch to GTK+ 3. If you think that development > model voids any weight of GIMP, fine. But actually I didn't even make > that "GIMP Toolkit" argument, it was put in my mouth
Michael, I'm very sorry if upset you or undermined your arguments. It was definitely not my intention. Sorry again and please take my excuses. > I literally meant > "GIMP and other applications" (such as Ardour). I suppose the cross- > platform argument still has some weight. > -- Andrew W. Nosenko <andrew.w.nose...@gmail.com> _______________________________________________ gtk-devel-list mailing list gtk-devel-list@gnome.org https://mail.gnome.org/mailman/listinfo/gtk-devel-list
