Thomas Schuerger wrote: > > > Then it would be servent, because it isn't a 'client'. It is a server > > > as well... > > > > But we don't ban individual servents (servent instances), but we ban all > > instances of a servent manufactured by a particular vendor, right? > > > > Maybe then rather "servent version" or "servent family"? > > What about "servent type"?
Type is very fuzzy IMHO. It could refer to any attribute of the node and on first sight I'd think it referred to leaf resp. ultrapeer although we call that peermode, IIRC. -- Christian
pgp0I2rF2802Q.pgp
Description: PGP signature
