> If the text is free form, maybe a better > form would be "Vendor would exceed %d%% of our slots".
Bill is completely right with that. And I'm not talking about grammar here. When the anti-monopoly-feature was first introduced, I was indeed mislead by the message. My gtkg was connecting to another host, and than dropped it with a "Vendor already has 70% of our slots". But that was wrong. At that point, only 50% (2 out of 4) of my slots were occupied by that specific vendor. Later I understood that everything was OK, and that it was only a misleading message that made me think of buggy code. And that was not about "already has" or "has already". In both cases, it would, to my understanding, talk about the ratio BEFORE it would connect to the additional peer in question. But what was obviously meant, was the ratio that would be exceeded AFTER gtkg would connect to that peer, if it wouldn't stop connecting to that host (what it therefore does). If the message had been "Vendor would exceed 70% of our slots", everything would have been completely clear to me from the beginning. Hauke Hachmann ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by the new InstallShield X. >From Windows to Linux, servers to mobile, InstallShield X is the one installation-authoring solution that does it all. Learn more and evaluate today! http://www.installshield.com/Dev2Dev/0504 _______________________________________________ Gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel
