Bill Pringlemeir wrote:
> I think they are two different uses/meanings.

I see this but to me it's rather subtle. I changed it because I thought
it was wrong or at least read somewhat awkward. If CVS would work ATM,
I or someone else would gratefully apply your suggestions.

> I also think that Goggle has bad grammar!

Sure, but it's not as bad as some people claim. If one looks closely
at the sentences which are found, you're usually on the right side. The
ratio alone can be wrong, of course, if a combination of words may
be used in completely different ways. YMMV.
 
> My concern is that people,
> using LimeWire, BearShare, etc., might see GTKG sending this message
> and get the wrong impression about the code.

Judge not code by the grammar, that ye be not judged by your code. ;-)
I mean how many native English speaker handle *any* other language
reasonably well?  Of course, it always looks a little incompetent when people
don't use a language perfectly. Highly intelligent people may appear as fools
even. However, GTKG is much more verbose than most other vendors' servents
and, AFAIK, most users won't even see our precious error messages.

> btw.  That was my only nit in the many recent changes.  Although I
> glossed over the GTK2 changes, because I don't know a lot about GTK
> (or at least less than 'C').

In my experience, you really have to *use* GTK+ to understand it and
find appropriate usage schemes. The documentation itself doesn't mention
a lot of subtle things and you often have to peek at the source code
to decide what's better or worse. There are mainly two things that
suck especially in GLib/GTK+ 2.x. First, the excessive use of dynamically
allocated memory. In theory that's cleaner but it causes severe performance
penalties due to memory copies (cache killer) and can easily cause
memory leaks. The other bad thing is the internal use of UTF-8. That's
OK for accessing files but internal and for the GUI you want to use a flat
encoding.

-- 
Christian

Attachment: pgpqYDafmMD58.pgp
Description: PGP signature

Reply via email to