On Sun, 9 Jan 2005 22:12:21 +0100 Christian Biere <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> You can, of course, successfully compile gtk-gnutella no matter how > much warnings the compiler barfs at you. The warnings cause no fatal > errors. However, I don't want people to get used to warnings because > some of those may actual indicate (severe) bugs. Also if there are > many warnings, it's easy miss the important ones in the noise. And no, > I don't want to use specific compiler flags to suppress specific > warnings or filter them with grep from the compile log. I see. > Well, if GCC trusts gettext(), it doesn't make a lot of sense to not > trust ngettext() equally. Thus, I've added NG_() (as short-hand for > ngettext() using the GCC attribute format_arg for the prototype as > suggested by R�diger Kuhlmann. I don't know whether gettext checks > the strings only during generation of the message catalogs or also at > load-time. I've updated latest cvs, compilation was success without error, then gtkg works fine at now, although just in my environment. Thank you Christian and R�diger! -- Daichi ------------------------------------------------------- The SF.Net email is sponsored by: Beat the post-holiday blues Get a FREE limited edition SourceForge.net t-shirt from ThinkGeek. It's fun and FREE -- well, almost....http://www.thinkgeek.com/sfshirt _______________________________________________ Gtk-gnutella-devel mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/gtk-gnutella-devel
