Tomas Volf <[email protected]> writes: >> -With R6RS and R7RS, the unified Scheme standardization process appears >> -to have more or less run its course. There will continue to be more >> -code written in terms of both systems, and modules defined using the >> -SRFI process, and Guile will support both. However for future >> -directions, Guile takes inspiration from other related language >> -communities: Racket, Clojure, Concurrent ML, and so on. >> +While R7RS yielded a unified Scheme standard, named r7rs-small, work is >> +underway to support a wider scope of programs with r7rs-large. There >> +will continue to be more code written in terms of both systems, and > > I think in the new text the "both systems" reads as "r7rs-small and > r7rs-large", with no mention of r6rs. Is that intentional?
No, that’s not intentional. Does this sound better? "While the R5RS and R6RS standards processses are completed and R7RS yielded a standard that managed to partially unified both, named r7rs-small, work is underway to support a wider scope of programs with r7rs-large. There will continue to be development in the R7RS standard, and now modules will be defined using the SRFI process, and Guile will support such efforts. However for future directions, Guile also takes inspiration from other related language communities: Racket, Clojure, Concurrent ML, and so on." Thank you for your review! Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein, ohne es zu merken. https://www.draketo.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
