On Mon, Oct 05, 2026 at 10:55:58PM +0200, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > <[email protected]> writes: > > > On Fri, Oct 02, 2026 at 09:37:21AM +0200, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > >> "While the R5RS and R6RS standards processses are completed and R7RS > >> yielded a standard that managed to partially unified both, named > > ^^^^^^^ > > unify > > Thank you! Fixd in the new patch. > > Tomas Volf <[email protected]> writes: > > "Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <[email protected]> writes: > >> "While the R5RS and R6RS standards processses are completed and R7RS > > > > s/processses/processes/ > > Thank you! Fixed! > > >> yielded a standard that managed to partially unified both, named > >> r7rs-small, work is underway to support a wider scope of programs with > >> r7rs-large. There will continue to be development in the R7RS standard, > >> and now modules will be defined using the SRFI process, and Guile will > > > > Maybe s/now/new/ ? > > I reworded that a bit more now: “There will continue to be development > in the R7RS standard, the SRFI process will provide more modules, and > Guile will support such efforts.”
Thank *you* for doing that work. One more nit: "There will continue to be development" sounds a bit awkward (note that I'm not a native speaker, so definitely talking outside my comfort zone!). Perhaps "Development in the R7RS standard is an ongoing process"? Cheers -- tomás
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
