"Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide" <[email protected]> writes: > Tomas Volf <[email protected]> writes: > >>> -With R6RS and R7RS, the unified Scheme standardization process appears >>> -to have more or less run its course. There will continue to be more >>> -code written in terms of both systems, and modules defined using the >>> -SRFI process, and Guile will support both. However for future >>> -directions, Guile takes inspiration from other related language >>> -communities: Racket, Clojure, Concurrent ML, and so on. >>> +While R7RS yielded a unified Scheme standard, named r7rs-small, work is >>> +underway to support a wider scope of programs with r7rs-large. There >>> +will continue to be more code written in terms of both systems, and >> >> I think in the new text the "both systems" reads as "r7rs-small and >> r7rs-large", with no mention of r6rs. Is that intentional? > > No, that’s not intentional. > > Does this sound better?
Yes :) > > "While the R5RS and R6RS standards processses are completed and R7RS s/processses/processes/ > yielded a standard that managed to partially unified both, named > r7rs-small, work is underway to support a wider scope of programs with > r7rs-large. There will continue to be development in the R7RS standard, > and now modules will be defined using the SRFI process, and Guile will Maybe s/now/new/ ? > support such efforts. However for future directions, Guile also takes > inspiration from other related language communities: Racket, Clojure, > Concurrent ML, and so on." > > Thank you for your review! > > Best wishes, > Arne -- There are only two hard things in Computer Science: cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
