Hi Arne, On 15.07.20 08:36, Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide wrote: > Zelphir Kaltstahl <zelphirkaltst...@posteo.de> writes: > >> One can write whole scientific books in org-mode > Or roleplaying books, which actually have higher requirements :-) > (I did both) > >>>> * Do you think license information should be written next to each item in >>>> the list? >>> First at foremost, the list _itself_ has to be licensed as a free >>> documentation. FWIW, most of ‘awesome lists’ are under CC0. >> While the list is not CC0, I meant to put it under "GNU Free >> Documentation License v1.3", which I think should be appropriate (Is it >> not?) and free as in freedom. Good that you hint at the license, because >> I thought it had a license already. > GFDL isn’t considered as free by the debian standards, because it can > have invariant sections. CC by-sa might be a good fit, since it is > compatible with GPLv3 and wikipedia at the same time. > > Best wishes, > Arne
Thanks for providing more info on the licenses. I just read multiple articles about GFDL and CC0 and still don't know what the better choice is for the list. In particular I do not find information about whether CC0 is copyleft or not (1), which perhaps means, that it is not and I do not understand the impact of invariant sections on the list (2). Can you help me out? Best regards, Zelphir -- repositories: https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl