Dmitry Alexandrov <[email protected]> writes: > Quoth <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#CC0> (emphasis mine): > | A work released under CC0 is dedicated to the public domain to the fullest > extent permitted by law. If that is not possible for any reason, CC0 also > provides a *lax, permissive* license as a fallback. Both public domain works > and the lax license provided by CC0 are compatible with the GNU GPL. > | > | If you want to release your non-software work to the public domain, we > recommend you use CC0. > > Besides being GPL-compatible, itʼs FDL-compatible as well, while CC BY-SA is > not.
That information is outdated. Since 2015 cc BY-SA is one-way compatible to GPLv3: https://www.draketo.de/english/free-software/by-sa-gpl Back then I invested a lot of time to make that happen, because I required it to be able to use art from Battle for Wesnoth, Ryzom, and Wikipedia in one roleplaying book. Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
