Dr. Arne Babenhauserheide <arne_...@web.de> writes: > Dmitry Alexandrov <d...@gnui.org> writes: > >> Quoth <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#CC0> (emphasis mine): >> | A work released under CC0 is dedicated to the public domain to the fullest >> extent permitted by law. If that is not possible for any reason, CC0 also >> provides a *lax, permissive* license as a fallback. Both public domain works >> and the lax license provided by CC0 are compatible with the GNU GPL. >> | >> | If you want to release your non-software work to the public domain, we >> recommend you use CC0. >> >> Besides being GPL-compatible, itʼs FDL-compatible as well, while CC BY-SA is >> not. > > That information is outdated. Since 2015 cc BY-SA is one-way compatible > to GPLv3: https://www.draketo.de/english/free-software/by-sa-gpl > > Back then I invested a lot of time to make that happen, because I > required it to be able to use art from Battle for Wesnoth, Ryzom, and > Wikipedia in one roleplaying book.
arg, I misunderstood you. CC by-sa is GPL-compatible, but not FDL compatible. But CC0 is not copyleft. Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein ohne es zu merken
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature