Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> skribis:
> commit d04efa0fff908de0f8822a27582b4b1c3dcae553
> Author: Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il>
> Date: Wed Oct 7 14:44:59 2015 +0300
>
> gnu: camlp4: Remove extra input.
>
> * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm (camlp4)[inputs]: Removed duplicate "ocaml"
> entry from native-inputs.
> ---
> gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 3 +--
> 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm
> index fc45805..0302c85 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm
> @@ -208,8 +208,7 @@ Git-friendly development workflow.")
> "0icdfzhsbgf89925gc8gl3fm8z2xzszzlib0v9dj5wyzkyv3a342"))
> (file-name (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz"))))
> (build-system gnu-build-system)
> - (native-inputs `(("ocaml" ,ocaml)
> - ("which" ,which)))
> + (native-inputs `(("which" ,which)))
> (inputs `(("ocaml" ,ocaml)))
This was probably correct: When cross-compiling, you would both need the
compiler (in ‘native-inputs’) and the run-time support library (thus in
‘inputs’.)
Now, this is mostly theoretical in this case because it would probably
take more than this to cross-compile OCaml code.
Ludo’.
