Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> skribis:
> On Wed, 07 Oct 2015 22:36:52 +0200
> l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) wrote:
>
>> Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> skribis:
>>
>> > commit d04efa0fff908de0f8822a27582b4b1c3dcae553
>> > Author: Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il>
>> > Date: Wed Oct 7 14:44:59 2015 +0300
>> >
>> > gnu: camlp4: Remove extra input.
>> >
>> > * gnu/packages/ocaml.scm (camlp4)[inputs]: Removed duplicate "ocaml"
>> > entry from native-inputs.
>> > ---
>> > gnu/packages/ocaml.scm | 3 +--
>> > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> >
>> > diff --git a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm
>> > index fc45805..0302c85 100644
>> > --- a/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm
>> > +++ b/gnu/packages/ocaml.scm
>> > @@ -208,8 +208,7 @@ Git-friendly development workflow.")
>> > "0icdfzhsbgf89925gc8gl3fm8z2xzszzlib0v9dj5wyzkyv3a342"))
>> > (file-name (string-append name "-" version ".tar.gz"))))
>> > (build-system gnu-build-system)
>> > - (native-inputs `(("ocaml" ,ocaml)
>> > - ("which" ,which)))
>> > + (native-inputs `(("which" ,which)))
>> > (inputs `(("ocaml" ,ocaml)))
>>
>> This was probably correct: When cross-compiling, you would both need the
>> compiler (in ‘native-inputs’) and the run-time support library (thus in
>> ‘inputs’.)
>>
>> Now, this is mostly theoretical in this case because it would probably
>> take more than this to cross-compile OCaml code.
>>
>> Ludo’.
>
> Should I go ahead and revert the change?
Yes, please.
Thanks!
Ludo’.
