Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> writes: > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 02:01:33PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: >> Like below? And how could I then access qscintilla-for-octave from >> maths.scm if it isn't defined publicly? > > Yes, that looks right. But I would put qscintilla-for-octave in > maths.scm to avoid the issue you describe.
So would you say that this is clean enough that I could push both of these changes in their respecitive files before modifying the Octave definition?
