On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 08:48:43PM +0000, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On September 13, 2016 11:37:35 PM GMT+03:00, Kei Kebreau > <k...@openmailbox.org> wrote: > >In this case, should I leave qtscintilla-qt4 as a public package in > >qt.scm > >instead of maths.scm as Leo suggested? > > That's where I would leave it. You could also leave a note, saying > that it was for octave, and if they switch to qt5 then we can get rid > of it. We still have an old vte package I added for a terminal since > all the bug reports around it haven't been cleared yet, and that's > with the other versions of vte. --
Sounds like a plan!
