On Wed, Sep 14, 2016 at 02:11:44PM -0400, Kei Kebreau wrote: > Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> writes: > > > On Tue, Sep 13, 2016 at 08:48:43PM +0000, Efraim Flashner wrote: > >> On September 13, 2016 11:37:35 PM GMT+03:00, Kei Kebreau > >> <k...@openmailbox.org> wrote: > >> >In this case, should I leave qtscintilla-qt4 as a public package in > >> >qt.scm > >> >instead of maths.scm as Leo suggested? > >> > >> That's where I would leave it. You could also leave a note, saying > >> that it was for octave, and if they switch to qt5 then we can get rid > >> of it. We still have an old vte package I added for a terminal since > >> all the bug reports around it haven't been cleared yet, and that's > >> with the other versions of vte. -- > > > > Sounds like a plan! > > Alright then! I have all three patches here. Tell me if I did anything > funny. The order of application is "Add qscintilla, Add qscintilla-qt4, > Enable Octave's Qt 4 GUI." :)
The patches "Add qscintilla" and "Add qscintilla-qt4" both add both packages.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
