On Tue, 26 May 2026 03:19:08 +0200 "pelzflorian (Florian Pelz)" <[email protected]> wrote:
> We cannot apply a strict policy retroactively in full consequence when > parts were not human-reviewed. For example, > po/doc/guix-cookbook.es.po had slop in commit > https://codeberg.org/guix/translations/commit/b286dbabcad77d037da17a387a079af1e942bd1a We could consider that as a bug and so enable humans that want to fix it, to be able to fix it, assuming that having this in git somehow doesn't create legal issues, but at least in this case I don't see how this commit could be a derived work of something that has an incompatible license. Denis.
pgpB9dMiTvDj9.pgp
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
