Hi Gabriel, all,
On Wed, 27 May 2026 at 10:55, Gabriel Wicki <[email protected]> wrote:
>> while appealing to overturn the process to an authority body?
>
> As suggested by Simon, yes.
Quoting what I wrote in [1]:
As for all the things in Guix, the current implicit status quo appears
to me: the final word when strong disagreement is from the Maintainer
collective. Do we have a strong disagreement here about throwing the
deadlines of GCD 001?
Quoting what I wrote in [2]:
If in good faith, you think the final state of the document has reached
a state that all the team members (lazily) agree on, then, FWIW, I think
it’s an incorrect understanding of the situation.
This is clearly stated by Vagrant’s message [3]. Therefore, quoting
what I wrote in [2] with an update:
Therefore, I conclude you strongly disagree with us (Andreas,
Rutherther,
Vagrant and me).
Ah this is a surprise for me. Bah ok, noted. For me, this is where
this has gotten ridiculous.
Well, I don’t know where all this is going. Or even if Guix Maintainers
are reading all this.
Gabriel, you are assuming the quorum is fine because a quarter person,
then you are arguing about how Greg’s disapproval should be interpreted,
so for the sake of our common understanding, let quote Greg’s message [4]:
the authors were unwilling to modify
or trim the proposal in the direction of consensus
And although we can debate if it’s legitimate or not, when taking some
distance about what’s currently going on, your solely current
argumentative logic against four members seems feeding the point that
people felt “unwilling to modify in the direction of consensus”, no?
Believe me or not, I know, and more than you think, all the efforts you
put in, and believe me or not, I understand that you feel frustrated –
even we all understand such frustration, IMHO.
That’s said, what do you expect? Really, in all friendship, do you
think all that helps in going in the direction you think the project
should go?
Cheers,
simon
1: Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn—or is it?
Simon Tournier <[email protected]>
Tue, 19 May 2026 16:53:15 +0200
id:[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2026-05
https://yhetil.org/guix/[email protected]
2: Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn—or is it?
Simon Tournier <[email protected]>
Sat, 23 May 2026 13:30:55 +0200
id:[email protected]
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2026-05
https://yhetil.org/guix/[email protected]
3: Re: Result GCD007: withdrawn—or endless debates?
Vagrant Cascadian <[email protected]>
Tue, 26 May 2026 12:43:49 -0700
id:87h5nux8ga.fsf@wireframe
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2026-05
https://yhetil.org/guix/87h5nux8ga.fsf@wireframe
4: Re: [GCD007] Deliberation Period: Teams, Special Teams and Memberships
Greg Hogan <[email protected]>
Fri, 01 May 2026 12:01:00 -0400
id:CA+3U0ZnyM83W1zeXb4TaiQRZBNQ_rm=rbipdwqyo8bdvekm...@mail.gmail.com
https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2026-05
https://yhetil.org/guix/CA+3U0ZnyM83W1zeXb4TaiQRZBNQ_rm=rbipdwqyo8bdvekm...@mail.gmail.com
