The corsets looked wrong to me, because they covered the hips, which is a Victorian thing. And the lines were Victorian also, although I have seen some things in Moda a Firenze that show a less stiff bodice line in Italy. Also, No chemises! (A pet peeve (among many) with "The Tudors" show on Showtime--no one would wear their costly, difficult-if-not-impossible-to-wash gowns next to their skin! Plus it would have made things much easier on the costume crew-just wash the chemises.) The animation is awesome, though. I'll have to check with my son and see if he's planning on getting this one. Sharon
-----Original Message----- From: h-costume-boun...@indra.com [mailto:h-costume-boun...@indra.com] On Behalf Of stils...@netspace.net.au Sent: Wednesday, July 08, 2009 4:10 AM To: Historical Costume Subject: Re: [h-cost] Ye olde modern art Actually, been looking at it again (hell, the work is too boring to do) and think it is the Durer-looking thing with the wrong corset silhouette. Maybe they watched Princess Diaz in Shrek, -C. ------------------------------------------------------------ This email was sent from Netspace Webmail: http://www.netspace.net.au _______________________________________________ h-costume mailing list h-costume@mail.indra.com http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume _______________________________________________ h-costume mailing list h-costume@mail.indra.com http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
