This post seems to have lots of images to show what you are talking about;  
however I can not access any of them - I ge a "forbiden" note at the top of 
every page.  Is there another way to see these images?

 

Paula

 


 
> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 16:47:09 -0500
> From: hope.greenb...@uvm.edu
> To: h-cost...@indra.com
> Subject: Re: [h-cost] Question: Regency trains?
> 
> Sounds lovely. Answering the question of what to do with a train, both 
> in terms of carrying it and in terms of protecting it, is a challenge. 
> Here are some thoughts:
> 
> For the gowns just before 1800 that were fuller, women are shown 
> twisting the train up behind their backs, holding a bit of it under 
> their arms, or pulling the fullness of the skirt around towards the 
> front. Here are some images from Heideloff's:
> 
> http://www.uvm.edu/~hag/1800train/heideloff-1795-03-0005.jpg
> http://www.uvm.edu/~hag/1800train/heideloff-1795-07-0005.jpg
> http://www.uvm.edu/~hag/1800train/heideloff-1795-10-0005.jpg
> http://www.uvm.edu/~hag/1800train/heideloff-1795-11-0002.jpg
> http://www.uvm.edu/~hag/1800train/heideloff-1797-08-0002.jpg
> http://www.uvm.edu/~hag/1800train/heideloff-1798-03-0005.jpg
> http://www.uvm.edu/~hag/1800train/heideloff-1799-05-0002.jpg
> http://www.uvm.edu/~hag/1800train/heideloff-1799-10-0002.jpg
> http://www.uvm.edu/~hag/1800train/heideloff-1800-10-0005.jpg
> 
> On the other hand, the fashionable ladies promenading at Kensington 
> Gardens in 1804 allowed their trains to flow behind them, so elegantly. 
> Notice, however, that their petticoats/undergowns also appear to be 
> trained. This might be a clue as to how to protect the overgown from 
> excessive soiling. A easy to wash plain cotton undergown beneath a 
> diaphonous overgown would work well.
> http://www.uvm.edu/~hag/1800train/1804-fashionsoflondon-promenade-Kensingtongardens.jpg
> 
> By 1810 trains all but disappear, and even before that there are many 
> images of gowns that have no trains.
> 
> And, as an aside, if making a formal gown for evening, be sure to 
> differentiate between 'ball dress' and 'evening wear.' I have yet to 
> find an image of a post-1810 ball gown that has a train. Up to and 
> around 1810 there are plenty of 'full dress' or 'evening wear' or 'opera 
> dress' gowns that do, but ball gowns, no.
> Ball dress: 
> http://www.uvm.edu/~hag/1800train/1809-wu-ackermann-balldress.png
> Evening full dress: 
> http://www.uvm.edu/~hag/1800train/1809-white-washington.jpg
> 
> By the way, I would be suspicious of claims that all women wrapped their 
> gowns over their arms to pull them tight. SOunds like a modern 
> interpretation!
> 
> - Hope
> _______________________________________________
> h-costume mailing list
> h-costume@mail.indra.com
> http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume
                                          
_________________________________________________________________
Hotmail: Powerful Free email with security by Microsoft.
http://clk.atdmt.com/GBL/go/201469230/direct/01/
_______________________________________________
h-costume mailing list
h-costume@mail.indra.com
http://mail.indra.com/mailman/listinfo/h-costume

Reply via email to