Hack RF is test gear Exempt
Sent from my iPhone > On 5 Aug 2017, at 6:55 am, Sergey Ivanov <ivanov1...@gmail.com> wrote: > > Thank you Chuck! > > I'll check this out. What do you mean by a radio stack? > For now my plan is to use pre-certified modules so that my board will be > certified as an unintentional radiator, which is thousands of $. > But I still need to prove that the board doesn't emit Electro Magnetic Field > above allowed. > > >> On Fri, 4 Aug 2017 at 23:35, Chuck McManis <chuck.mcma...@gmail.com> wrote: >> I am not sure exactly what you are asking. >> >> If you want to get FCC certification for your device, there is a process it >> is documented at the FCC web site here: >> https://www.fcc.gov/engineering-technology/laboratory-division/general/equipment-authorization >> >> That pretty much outlines the steps. If you are using a manufacturer >> supplied radio stack you may be able to leverage their certification but if >> you wrote your own stack you will need to do the authorization >> independently. There are a number of consultancies in the US who will handle >> the process for you (for a fee of course). A long time ago (2006) I was on a >> project that needed such certification and the vendor hired charged $50,000 >> and it took four months to complete. They did all the required paperwork and >> followed up on all of the questions the FCC had, they also flew out an >> engineer to an FCC certified test facility to get the verification tests >> done. (I live in the San Francisco bay area and the FCC testing facilities >> around here are typically reserved months, if not years, in advance it >> seems). >> >> --Chuck >> >>> On Fri, Aug 4, 2017 at 1:00 PM, Sergey Ivanov <ivanov1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> Is there someone who did this or similar task before? >>> Any specific suggestions? >>> >>> >>> >>>> On 4 August 2017 at 21:57, Andrew Rich <vk4...@internode.on.net> wrote: >>>> >>>> You can do what ever you like as long as you understand the rules for a >>>> licence and GNU Radio >>>> >>>> Andrew >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>> >>>>>> On 5 Aug 2017, at 4:26 am, Sergey Ivanov <ivanov1...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>>>> >>>>> >>>>>> Hi All! >>>>>> >>>>>> I have a product which uses nRF24L01+ 2.4 GHz modules for >>>>>> communication. Now we have plans to go to North America market, and I am >>>>>> not sure if my Chinese nRF modules can pass FCC test. If they can't, >>>>>> then I need to re-design my PCB (now I use 2 layers logic board and nRF >>>>>> on a socket). >>>>>> Can I use HackRF to imitate FCC test on my workbench? >>>>> >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> HackRF-dev mailing list >>>>> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com >>>>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev >>>> >>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Best Regards, >>> >>> Sergey Ivanov >>> +7 910 424 9895 >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> HackRF-dev mailing list >>> HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com >>> https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev >>> >> > > -- > Best Regards, > > Sergey Ivanov > +7 910 424 9895 > _______________________________________________ > HackRF-dev mailing list > HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com > https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
_______________________________________________ HackRF-dev mailing list HackRF-dev@greatscottgadgets.com https://pairlist9.pair.net/mailman/listinfo/hackrf-dev
