On 26/07/2016 03:08 μμ, Willy Tarreau wrote:
> On Tue, Jul 26, 2016 at 02:05:56PM +0100, Mark Brookes wrote:
>>> So for sure I definitely support this proposal :-)
>>
>> Thats great news. Do you have a JSON structure in mind?
>> Or would you like me to come up with something?
> 
> I'm probably the worst ever person to suggest a JSON structure. If you
> have any ideas, please bring them on the list. You know how it works,
> once nobody criticizes anymore, your design is fine. And you'll just
> have to ignore people who complain after the work is done :-)
> 
> Cheers,
> Willy
> 

Here is a suggestion
{
    "frontend": {
        "www.haproxy.org": {
            "bin": "999999999999",
            "lbtot": "555555",
            ...
        },
        "www.haproxy.com": {
            "bin": "999999999999",
            "lbtot": "555555",
            ...
        },
    },
    "backend": {
        "www.haproxy.org": {
            "bin": "999999999999",
            "lbtot": "555555",
            ....
            "server": {
                "srv1": {
                    "bin": "999999999999",
                    "lbtot": "555555",
                   ....
                },
                ...
            }

        },
    },
    "haproxy": {
        "id1": {
            "PipesFree": "555",
            "Process_num": "1",
            ...
        },
        "id2": {
            "PipesFree": "555",
            "Process_num": "2",
            ...
        },
        ...
    },
}

Cheers,
Pavlos


Attachment: signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to