hmm. seems, we need some musl or picolibc in CI. beeing glibc dependent is dangerous
чт, 16 апр. 2020 г. в 13:29, Willy Tarreau <w...@1wt.eu>: > Hi Lukas, > > On Thu, Apr 16, 2020 at 09:44:39AM +0200, Lukas Tribus wrote: > > Provide the output of "which haproxy" and "haproxy -vv", I doubt you > > are actually running the Redhat package you indicated, more likely you > > built Haproxy manually from source on top of it. > > This just makes me think that on glibc-based systems we could use > getauxval() to report the full path name to the executable in case > of error. I'll see if I can come up with something usable. > > Willy > >
