On Wed, May 12, 2021 at 09:12:25AM +0200, Tim Düsterhus wrote: > Willy, > > On 5/12/21 7:47 AM, Willy Tarreau wrote: > > Interestingly, the code for variables was initially made for the config, > > so it doesn't seem to destroy variable names when they're released since > > that was pointless with the config. I think that code should be revisited > > in 2.5 to improve the situation (e.g. by marking that the variable was > > dynamically allocated maybe), but I don't know this part well so I'll > > probably stop before starting to suggest stupidities :-) > > > > There's also this related issue from back when I implemented this additional > parameter: > > https://github.com/haproxy/haproxy/issues/624
Yes, and it's still unclear to me how this storage is currently arranged, (i.e. why only store names?) I should have a look for 2.5 probably. Willy
