On Tue, 18 Nov 2008, Szak�ts Viktor wrote: Hi Viktor,
>> #!/usr/bin/hbrun >> proc main() >> alert( "Hello World!!!" ) >> return >> I have big internet shop application which with hundreds >> CGI harbour scripts and it does not work with MacOSX. > This should work regardless of our static vs. dynlib issue. > So it's off topic. No. It's pefectly related to your arguments. Such scirpts needs strict hbrun localization. The same is with shared library. All your problems with shared library is the fact that you do not put it in default OS directory. So please explain me how you plan to make harbour binaries for MacOSX which will put hbrun in /usr/bin and I'll kindly ask to make the same with harbour*.dyn Everything will work out of the box. If there is sth else wrong with share libraries support in MacOSX then it should be fixed. 99% of job is already done so I hope MacOSX user can tune the rest. I'm sorry but I cannot make everything myself. If it will be necessary then you can make system wide and user wide installation. I hope that MacOSX has such functionality and it's not necessary to install everything in each user account. If you do not have working complex solution then please do not change current behavior for your personal preferences because it highly possible that such modificaiton will have to be reverted after user will have adopted their code for it. The only one think I want to ask you is to stop adding workarounds but invest time in creating some final and working solution. > I'm getting (with a private built hbrun which works): > --- > Error BASE/9995 Corruption detected: HB_HRBRUN > Called from HB_HRBRUN(0) > Called from _APPMAIN(0) > --- > Maybe something obvious from my side, this is the first > time I tried hbrun this way on any platform. It's standard RT error message when you try to execute sth what is not valid .hrb file, f.e: hrbrun /bin/bash by default any files which have different then .prg extension are executed by hbrun directly as .hrb files. In some *nixes it's possible to execute .hrb files directly as any other binaries. It's enough to register their body prefix with exact hbrun localization and set executable attribute for them. If harbour will have support for extended .hrb (.hrl,.hre) formats then I can create some scripts which enable such functionality in Linux. best regards, Przemek _______________________________________________ Harbour mailing list Harbour@harbour-project.org http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
