I've moved new ole to hbwin, because otherwise we will very very
slowly adapt to
it, since very few users would test it.

In just one day now at least we begin to have a better idea about problems,
which is good, and until things settle everyone can use the last know
revision which is compatible with all old tools, or can even revert to last
known untouched hbwin.lib alone and continue using it locally. We're in
development / unstable phase and such unstable periods are expected
and normal in such environment. Luckily we have these periods rarely,
this is one of them.

Now, back to topic, since it seems some 3rd party tools and code are
heavily relying on some wrong (well, at the time maybe only) concepts
established in the past, I'm more and more thinking of moving new
implementations to a new namespace or just simply new function
names and leaving the old ones under either some sort of compatibility
lib or compatibility names. Probably a whole hbwinold lib would be
needed to satisfy some 3rd parties. This approach could keep full
compatibility without any compromises and could give us freedom to
develop / bugfix anything at our best without being tied up with such
concerns.

So:

hbwin.lib - New implementation, with clean concepts, names, OLE, etc.
hbwinold.lib - Old implementation kept for compatibility until 3rd parties
can adapt. Code frozen.

Any opinions?

Brgds,
Viktor

On Thu, May 14, 2009 at 3:47 PM, Pritpal Bedi <bediprit...@hotmail.com>wrote:

>
> Rossine
>
> You have to apply patch in olecore.c itself.
> You cannot club this function in #prgma begin/end
> construct. Rebuild olecore.c.
>
> Also try Przemek's refinements. May be any could help.
>
> Regards
> Pritpal Bedi
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/Errors-with-11032-tp23521549p23540931.html
> Sent from the Harbour - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Harbour mailing list
> Harbour@harbour-project.org
> http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour
>
_______________________________________________
Harbour mailing list
Harbour@harbour-project.org
http://lists.harbour-project.org/mailman/listinfo/harbour

Reply via email to