Fair enough. It is just disconcerting to see all this talk about how to find "loopholes" in FDA regulations (e.g., the use vs. marketing discussion). I realize not everyone lives in the U.S. and not everyone is subject to the same laws, but I'd think VistA developers would want to embrace regulations designed to promote quality and safety, not attempt to skirt them.
As far as scanned documents go: well, I think I've already said I think trying to use medical imaging software and equipment to manage scanned documents is a ridiculous case of overkill. But I'll just leave it at that. --- Thurman Pedigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > They may be still safer than some chemicals promoted in health food > stores - > or more important, consider the safety of paper records - where is > FDA > there? ...thx/t > === Gregory Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Design quality doesn't ensure success, but design failure can ensure failure." --Kent Beck ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
