Off hand, I don't know, but members of this list do seem to have a tendency to "plug" GT.M (presumably because it is open source). Personally, I think we'd all benefit from a little more vendor neutrality.
--- Thurman Pedigo <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > . GT.M, for > > instance is quite > > capable of uploading and downloading binary data, such as images, > just > > fine. It can also > > easily hand off that task to utilities available in the Linux > environment. > > Hmm - Does Cache not have this capability? > > thurman > === Gregory Woodhouse <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "Design quality doesn't ensure success, but design failure can ensure failure." --Kent Beck ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
