On Mon, 2005-08-22 at 12:04, Greg Woodhouse wrote: > First of all, this is not a WorldVistA list, this is Hardhats. If > WorldVistA chooses to focus entirely on GT.M that is their choice, but > not everyone running (or interested in running) VistA will use GT.M, > and the intent of this list is to focus on VistA infrastructure > regardless of the platform. >
I understand this, but what are you going to do when the seemingly majority of developers on the list are making the rational decision to use the Free Software product. Should the letters G T and M be expunged from the list? You can't make VistA work without the right kind of database and the two are strongly intertwined. I wish I could run it with MYSQL, but I can't. It's difficult for me to understand any complaint in regard to the lists members focusing on GT.M which is the Free Software database backend that they are using. It sound to me a little bit like complaining about gentrification. Ruben ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Hardhats-members mailing list Hardhats-members@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/hardhats-members
