Thanks, when I tested the AV program I was impressed, was not so impressed with Nod but how it works is the most important thing. fp
At 02:58 PM 10/28/2007, Chris Shaw Poked the stick with: >I thought I would put in a good word for Kaspersky. I have been using it >for a couple of years & it's saved my butt quite a few times. I've also >been using it on my client machines as well. In the past year it has >been doing a really good job of catching some spyware trojans. > >I have to vote for Kaspersky. > >On Sun, 28 Oct 2007 01:00:23 GMT >Joe User <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> >> Hello Thane, >> >> Friday, October 26, 2007, 3:30:57 PM, you wrote: >> >> > At 05:13 PM 26/10/2007, FORC5 wrote: >> >>Customer asking about security suites, I have recommended these to >> >>her but have not used either in a suite ( just stand alone AV ) >> >> > I don't recommend suites - I'm not convinced one needs more than a >> > hardware firewall plus XP firewall, so why add additional drag to >> > one's machine? Anti-spam is best done at the server via Postini or >> > something like it. Phishing control is best handled at the browser >> > and with common sense. So why go with more than just a good AV (such >> > as NOD32?) There is an Eset Suite coming out, but I haven't used it, >> > and doubt I'll be selling it. >> >> SECONDED - NOD32 / ESET >> -- >> Regards, >> joeuser - Still looking for the 'any' key... >> > >-- >C L Shaw <>< ><[EMAIL PROTECTED]> >Today is a moment for you to clip yet another strand from >the rope of earth, so that when he returns you won't be tied up. -- Tallyho ! ]:8) Taglines below ! -- Fact: fourteen out of every ten people like chocolate.