Nope, if it's old, it won't do better than that. I originally had a 7800GT (Nvidia) in my system and upgraded to an 8800GT to get decent response. Note that UT3 is normally frame locked at 60fps (which makes me laugh at some of the reviews on the web), so unless you specifically go in and change the vertical sync lock, it'll top out at 60 fps.
The 7800GT did 20 to 30 fps, the 8800GT jumped that to 40-60 making it 'playable', however you will get frustrated with the game as they did not correct the problems with UT2004 and added some new ones. In UT3, single player, you can only play as Reaper, and your team is pre-selected and not very good. As you go up in difficulty, the enemy bots get tougher, but your team stays the same, making it almost as if you were doing it alone. As for the rest of it, Bots can still shoot through corners, they still possess weapons they couldn't have possibly picked up and no, you still can't tell where they are aiming. On 8/4/08, maccrawj <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I'd not expect stellar from that card give how old vs. UT3. > > RAM drive for TEMP likely counter-productive. > > If you upgrade, skip Sapphire next time! > > > Winterlight wrote: > > I just started playing UT3. I am trying to get my video to be more > responsive. I am running a dual Xeon 3.06, 4GB DDR400, and a Sapphire Radeon > X1950 PRO 512MB AGP. I have the swap file turned off and I am using a RAM > drive for temp. > > > > When I am playing the game I never get above 60 percent CPU and I always > have lots of RAM available, so it has to be the video card. It started out > at 1024 X 768 but even there is seems a little slow and sloppy on response. > Is there anything I can set up to pick up the video response. I know it is > a older video card but I think it should do better then this. > > > > Thanks > > > > > > >
