Subject line fixed :-) Sent from my BlackBerry® wireless device from Aljawal
-----Original Message----- From: DHSinclair <dsinc...@bellsouth.net> Date: Tue, 19 May 2009 17:33:21 To: <hardware@hardwaregroup.com> Subject: Re: [H] [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Re: [Bulk] Windows 7 RC Torrent == Bad Stan, Please fix your email. Getting tired of the [H][Bulk] business. RU really clandestine? More inline below............ Best, Duncan At 15:40 05/19/2009 -0500, you wrote: >Dude [bad rejoiner if you want to keep the discussion friendly!], I don't >want to get into a flame war >[reads like you really do!] > with you but 3 countries >[which 3? ULive in SoCal, so why do you even care about the other 2? U do >not live there........Oh!, Japan, Korea? Why do you even care? THEY >depen on U and I do buy what they build.....] > have independently concluded that Intel bribed manufacturers to freeze > out AMD in their distribution networks with so-called rebates and to > delay the release of AMD based products. AMD didn't make crappy PC's with > their products. >[just your opinion. Info here in the SE is that most of the returns are AMD.] > They made some missteps along the way (Phenom I) as Intel did (Netburst) > but AMD didn't attempt to bribe manufacturers to give preference to their > products. Intel did and next March we're going to see Intel get spanked > again in US court this time. The Ati division of AMD makes excellent > GPU's and I predict that nVidia is going to have a rude awakening in the > 4th quarter when DX11 high performance cards come out. >[Clearly your opinion! My last 6 months with ATI video cards leaves me to >beg the HWG for suggestions to go back to nVidia. Yes, ATI may eventually >catch up. Right now, today, I am still watching; and converting back to >nVidia as fast as I can($)] >Larrabee is going to get spanked by both camps when Intel realizes that >using x86 to make a video card is another netburst dead end. ;-) I do accept that UR an AMD fan-boy. Very strong. Fine. Suspected this 5 yrs ago. Now confirmed. OK. Perhaps I might be wimpy. Acceptable. I started way back when with Intel (IP266). Now, I am coming back to Intel just because it seems to me [?] that planet Earth is also moving Intel. You have every right to just label me a whore..........on the other side.......... :) No problemo! Best, Duncan >maccrawj wrote: >>EU thinks anti-competitive the minute a company is successful & dominates >>based on customer choice. >> >>I say "look at all the crappy PC's that could have been made with AMD >>chips these past 5 years (and some have been)! It's not been good for AMD >>these past ~5 years and it has a more to do with AMD than Intel, just >>look at them fraking up ATI. >> >>Stan Zaske wrote: >>>Yeah, Intel has been in the news a lot lately and their poor decisions >>>are costing them dearly. Japan, Korea and now the EU have concluded that >>>they are anti-competitive. Next year I believe AMD will get their shot >>>in court and I predict that Intel will again be held accountable. >>>Imagine all the money that AMD lost over the past 5 years because of >>>Intel's bribes to PC makers. Beginning to look like the GM of the >>>semiconductor world minus the threat of bankruptcy of course.
