It's Intuit... We use Quickbooks (old version even) and it needs .NET I guess the .net service packs / new versions are not successfully installing over windows update?
Scott On Aug 9, 2010, at 9:34 AM, DSinc wrote: > Joe/Bobby/Rick/Scott, > We can close this thread. I'll figure something out. > > I understand. Yes, I started using a program that needed dot-net 2 years ago. > Probably still use, but can not recall which ATM. Could be Mozilla TBird, > Intuit, Nolo, Bond Wizard, or, some subtle change my online banking software > implemented in a major update years back. Sorry. Stuff happens. LOL! > > I asked here and was convinced to just start using dot.net. I have seen no > negative behavior since. I started at v1.1. I seem to be at v3.x sp1 now on > my main office client. > > The newest version 4.x does not work with XP. Fine. No issue. I am > completing a new build of XP on what has turned out to be a very challenging > set of hdw. Years back I researched dot-net via MS KB's. I was lead to > believe I DID NOT have to re-install all the previous versions of dot-net to > come current; that all new versions contained all the necessary links and > bits of the old version. OK. That makes sense. It just does not seem to > work....... Fails to install ATM. > > Summary: I'll just reload v1.1 base and wait for MS to decide what else is > necessary! > Thanks, > Duncan > > > On 08/08/2010 17:34, Joe User wrote: >> >> >> >> You will be assimilated. >> >> >> >> >> Sunday, August 8, 2010, 1:33:25 PM, Bobby wrote: >> >>> The .Net libraries are kind of like the C libraries of old. The libraries >>> contain methods that the calling programs can use. >> >>> Bobby >> >> >> >>
