They play around a bit with the core and memory clocks--a factory overclock, yes. I generally try to go for the highest clock while trying to stay close to the price range of the series. Cooling solution and warranty service are more important to me than that though.
Keep in mind at least one of your displays will have to be a DP output - do any of your monitors have native DP? -----Original Message----- From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of Winterlight Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 4:49 PM To: [email protected] Subject: Re: [H] how to compare Thanks Greg, I have looked at the 660 and I guess I will spend the extra hundred. Why do different video cards of the same number have different core speeds ... are they over clocked.. what is the difference.. is all about the speed and amount of RAM At 02:24 PM 8/26/2013, you wrote: >No, there is no quantitative specification that's meaningful to compare >except between two models within a single series/generation from the >same manufacturer. You'll have to look at reviews and benchmarks. > >I still think evga is among the best on the nvidia side. > >Something like a 650Ti would be about double a single 5750, but I'd >probably opt for the 660. > >-----Original Message----- >From: [email protected] >[mailto:[email protected]] On Behalf Of >Winterlight >Sent: Monday, August 26, 2013 2:30 PM >To: [email protected] >Subject: [H] how to compare > >I want to replace my two ATI 5750 cards Crossfire with a single Nividia >card that is capable of driving three large monitors plus the HDMI. >Gaming is not an issue as long as I keep the performance I have now. > >So what is the best way to compare...Core clock? So if my 5750 cards >run at 650Mhz times two...can I say a comparable card with be a GTX >650 which runs at 1058Mhz core clock. Does that make any kind of sense? > >What are the best, most reliable manufactures for Nvidia video cards? >right now I am focusing on EVGA
