But i would say these are few things that are though to common to all of us but it is better to be arranged that if some novice are coming then they can not damage our intentions and put us into some legal issues. thnx again geir
On 7/13/05, Mark Wielaard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi, > > Most of this seems common sense. And I am a bit surprised people feel > that it needs to be spelled out. But it is probably good to make the > intentions completely clear even for a public list. > > Just one little nitpick. > > On Wed, 2005-07-13 at 10:22 -0400, Geir Magnusson Jr. wrote: > > The terms and conditions that apply to > > your Contributions are defined by either a contributor license > > agreement (CLA) signed by you and/or your employer or, if no such CLA > > is on file at the Foundation, by the terms and conditions of > > Contributions as defined by the Apache License, Version 2.0. > > Could we not use the Apache License, Version 2.0. But state something > like "are in the public domain". (Or use APL/GPL-dual license, LGPL, > MIT/X, modern-BSD, etc.) So that we can all use such contributions. > Most of the existing projects, like gcj, kaffe, cacao, jamvm, GNU > Classpath, etc. cannot accept GPL-incompatible code. > > Thanks, > > Mark > > > BodyID:60059176.2.n.logpart (stored separately) > > -- Usman Bashir Certified IBM XML Solution Developer Certified UML Developer Brainbench Certified Internet Perfessional[advance](BCIP) Brainbench Certified Java Perfessional (BCJP) Brainbench Certified .NET Perfessional Brainbench Ceritified C++ Perfessional (BCCP) Software engineer IT24 Faculty Member Operation Badar Lahore
