Mikhail Loenko wrote: > Seems like I've managed to reproduce the problem: > > I've refactored the code using Eclipse: all that is under > com.openintel.drl.security > I've moved under > org.apache.harmony
Can you make that org.apache.harmony.security -- then we keep the module name in there. When we build into a single rt.jar it will avoid any unfortunate name collisions with implementations in other modules. > Then I've searched for and found 18 files that still contained > "com.openintel.drl.security" for some reason, and made > search&replace > > After that build failed: > BUILD FAILED > build.xml:393: Test java.security.serialization.CodeSignerTest failed > > Will investigate... > > > BTW, where will we move "com.openintel.drlx" to? > > org.apache.harmony_x ? > org.apache.harmonx ? > org.apache.hx ? Yuk! let's stick with org.apache.harmony.<whatever> package names. Regards, Tim > Thanks, > Mikhail > > > On 1/18/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> I've just updated from SVN, all unit tests from security2 passed >> (including serialization ones). >> Could you please provide more details? >> >> Thanks, >> Mikhail >> >> >> On 1/18/06, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >>> I am haplessly plodding along. I found one problem (mine) which fixed a >>> test, and now I seem to have a more interesting problem with the >>> serialization tests... >>> >>> Are the serialization tests "golden data" files somehow dependent the >>> com.openintel package structure and would be allergic to a >>> org.apache.harmony package structure? >>> >>> geir >>> >>> >>> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: >>>> I've been trying to refactor security2 into the org.apache pacakage space. >>>> >>>> I'm now having test failures. >>>> >>>> Can someone else do a co of security2 and verify? I've backed out the >>>> change so that you need junit and bcprov on your classpath (argh!) and >>>> turned on haltonfailure so that the tests will stop once something goes >>>> wrong. >>>> >>>> I thought I was being careful - while it's clear that I have no idea >>>> what I'm doing, there's clearly something a little more subtle going on >>>> here because I wouldn't think that just moving package names would be a >>>> problem. I assume that there's some provider or other configuration-ish >>>> issue. >>>> >>>> This would be a good learning experience for all of us how this works. I >>>> need to run out for about 20 min... bbiab. >>>> >>>> geir >>>> >>>> > -- Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) IBM Java technology centre, UK.
