Could there be a switch to over-ride the global exclude list
entry/entries? This way a module by default would use a global exclude
list and also have the freedom to ignore it and use the module exclude list.
Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
However, I did imagine that we'd give the modules a bit of freedom and
independence for testing - a global exclude list might impact that?
Stepan Mishura wrote:
Did anybody think of creating a 'global' (i.e. shared by all modules)
exclude list or every module will have its own exclude list? Or Harmony
tests will always pass and we don't need it at all :-)
That would be the goal :)
I see at least the following benefits of creating 'global' exclude
list: all
know issues are kept in one well known place (they don't spread between
several private lists)
That's true, but.... I always imagined that people would be working
in the modules anyway, so there isn't much gain.
also it is easier to create an exclude list for a
target platform, for example, linux.exclude or win.exclude.
Yes, that could be. Interesting idea.
However, I did imagine that we'd give the modules a bit of freedom and
independence for testing - a global exclude list might impact that?
geir
Thoughts?
Thanks,
Stepan Mishura
Intel Middleware Products Division
--
Karan Singh
