Hi Richard, Yes, I'm always for simplifying testing routine. And creating a detail guide for configuring some testing server is a possible way to do it. However I'd prefer to try to develop a simple local test server that is easy to configure. I believe that it will cover most of cases.
And I assume that there may be a number of sophisticated test cases that requires a special server set up. But I'd place them separately this was discussed in '[testing] code for exotic configurations' topic. Otherwise there is a chance to get the following detailed instructions: 1) Download http server from http://www.apache.org ... 50) Do this and that ... 100) Now you can run net tests Thanks, Stepan On 2/22/06, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Dears, > Agree that server (maybe not local) is required for some sophisticated > test cases. To make thing simply, we may provide more detail guide > (step-by-step) on how to setup/configure a typical testing server. Or > shall we setup a test server and allow user to share our testing server? > > Richard Liang > China Software Development Lab, IBM > > > > Tim Ellison wrote: > > Stepan Mishura wrote: > > > >> I glanced through a local server code from HARMONY-57 contribution > without > >> looking into implementation details and ... this made me think. I catch > hold > >> of the following: > >> 1) The server contains some testing code that looks not good for me > >> > > > > Care to explain? > > > > > >> 2) It is not as simple as I expected - my impression was that a local > server > >> implementation should be very simple because we are not going to test > >> whether it corresponds to http spec. or not. IMHO, it should only > provide a > >> test case with: > >> - a port number to open communication > >> - access to a server's input/output streams to verify a request to a > server > >> or to form a server's response. > >> Naive? Well, I'm aware that I'm not so experienced in java.netdevelopment > >> and testing and may be I'm wrong. > >> > > > > The local server I referenced can be used for a number of the java.net > > tests, some of which do require more sophisticated behavior, like basic > > authentication, eTags, etc. > > > > I agree that the tests in HARMONY-71 only need something to accept their > > connection, but I was simply pointing out that there will be a local > > server we can use if that contribution is accepted into the project, so > > probably not worth writing another. > > > > > >> I'd like to start with the first issue (BTW, is it ok to discuss > details of > >> contribution implementation if it is not accepted yet?). > >> > > > > Sure -- I would expect people to be evaluating it thoroughly so that > > they can vote the code in/out. The PPMC will shout early if the > > paperwork implies a contribution is unacceptable. > > > > > >> Can we avoid adding > >> a code that is specific for some test case to a local server? > >> > > > > Does it interfere with what you want to do? > > In some cases, the test case needs to know what is on the server a > > priori, so that it can test the client behavior correctly. > > > > Regards, > > Tim > > > > > >> On 2/16/06, Tim Ellison wrote: > >> > >>> I would rather that you just opened a new JIRA issue for that as it > >>> doesn't relate to the original problem. > >>> > >>> FYI there is a local server incoming in the HARMONY-57 contribution, > so > >>> don't spend any time on it, see: > >>> > >>> > <HARMONY-57>\Harmony\Harmony_Tests\src\test\java\tests\support\Support_HttpServer.java > >>> > >>> Regards, > >>> Tim > >>> > >>> Stepan Mishura (JIRA) wrote: > >>> > >>>> [ > >>>> > >>> > http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-71?page=comments#action_12366637 > ] > >>> > >>>> Stepan Mishura commented on HARMONY-71: > >>>> --------------------------------------- > >>>> > >>>> Tim, > >>>> > >>>> Added test case (test_setUseCachesZ) depends on network and it fails > if > >>>> > >>> it can not create connection with apache.org. The same for HARMONY-72. > I'm > >>> going to attach a patch file with a local server in it. Could you > reopen > >>> this JIRA? > >>> > >>>> Thanks, > >>>> Stepan. > >>>> > >>>> > >>>>> java.net.URLConnection.setUseCaches throws unspecified > >>>>> > >>> IllegalAccessError > >>> > -------------------------------------------------------------------------- > >>> > >>>>> Key: HARMONY-71 > >>>>> URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-71 > >>>>> Project: Harmony > >>>>> Type: Bug > >>>>> Components: Classlib > >>>>> Reporter: Svetlana Samoilenko > >>>>> Assignee: Tim Ellison > >>>>> According to j2se 1.4.2 specification method > >>>>> > >>> java.net.URLConnection.setUseCaches(boolean) throws > IllegalStateException, > >>> if already connected. Harmony throws java.lang.IllegalAccessErrorinstead, > >>> that contradicts the specification. > >>> > >>>>> Code to reproduce: > >>>>> import java.io.IOException; > >>>>> import java.net.*; > >>>>> public class test2 { > >>>>> public static void main(String[] args) { > >>>>> HttpURLConnection u=null; > >>>>> try { > >>>>> u=(HttpURLConnection)(new URL("http://intel.com > >>>>> > >>> ").openConnection()); > >>> > >>>>> u.connect(); > >>>>> } catch (MalformedURLException e) { > >>>>> System.out.println("unexpected > MalformedURLException"+e); > >>>>> } catch (IOException f) { > >>>>> System.out.println("unexpected IOException"+f); > >>>>> } > >>>>> try { > >>>>> u.setUseCaches(true); > >>>>> } catch (IllegalStateException e) { > >>>>> System.out.println("OK. Expected IllegalStateException"); > >>>>> e.printStackTrace(); > >>>>> }; > >>>>> } > >>>>> } > >>>>> Steps to Reproduce: > >>>>> 1. Build Harmony (check-out on 2006-01-30) j2se subset as described > in > >>>>> > >>> README.txt. > >>> > >>>>> 2. Compile test2.java using BEA 1.4 javac > >>>>> > >>>>>> javac -d . test2.java > >>>>>> > >>>>> 3. Run java using compatible VM (J9) > >>>>> > >>>>>> java -showversion test2 > >>>>>> > >>>>> Output: > >>>>> C:\tmp>C:\jrockit-j2sdk1.4.2_04\bin\java.exe -showversion test2 > >>>>> java version "1.4.2_04" > >>>>> Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_04-b05 > ) > >>>>> BEA WebLogic JRockit(TM) 1.4.2_04 JVM (build > >>>>> > >>> ari-31788-20040616-1132-win-ia32, Native Threads, GC strategy: > parallel) > >>> > >>>>> OK. Expected IllegalStateException > >>>>> java.lang.IllegalStateException: Already connected > >>>>> at java.net.URLConnection.setUseCaches(Z)V( > URLConnection.java > >>>>> > >>> :828) > >>> > >>>>> at test2.main([Ljava.lang.String;)V(test2.java:17) > >>>>> C:\tmp>C:\harmony\trunk\deploy\jre\bin\java -showversion test2 > >>>>> (c) Copyright 1991, 2005 The Apache Software Foundation or its > >>>>> > >>> licensors, as applicable. > >>> > >>>>> java.lang.IllegalAccessError: Connection already established > >>>>> at java.net.URLConnection.setUseCaches(URLConnection.java > :923) > >>>>> at test2.main(test2.java:17) > >>>>> Suggested junit test case: > >>>>> ------------------------ > URLConnectionTest.java------------------------------------------------- > >>>>> import java.io.IOException; > >>>>> import java.net.*; > >>>>> import junit.framework.*; > >>>>> public class URLConnectionTest extends TestCase { > >>>>> public static void main(String[] args) { > >>>>> junit.textui.TestRunner.run(URLConnectionTest.class); > >>>>> } > >>>>> public void test_setUseCaches () { > >>>>> HttpURLConnection u=null; > >>>>> try { > >>>>> u=(HttpURLConnection)(new URL("http://intel.com > >>>>> > >>> ").openConnection()); > >>> > >>>>> u.connect(); > >>>>> } catch (MalformedURLException e) { > >>>>> fail("unexpected MalformedURLException"+e); > >>>>> } catch (IOException f) { > >>>>> fail("unexpected IOException"+f); > >>>>> } > >>>>> try { > >>>>> u.setUseCaches(true); > >>>>> } catch (IllegalStateException e) { //expected > >>>>> }; > >>>>> } > >>>>> } > >>>>> > >>> -- > >>> > >>> Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED]) > >>> IBM Java technology centre, UK. > >>> > >>> > > > > > > -- Thanks, Stepan Mishura Intel Middleware Products Division
