Geir Magnusson Jr wrote:
So, does this summarize to :

1) We need a new server or we should enahnce the current one?

2) We need instructions on how to do this.

?

(I hope we don't need httpd to test Harmony...)

Could you remind me what the "current one" is ?

What is the problem with using httpd to test Harmony ?




Stepan Mishura wrote:
Hi Richard,

Yes, I'm always for simplifying testing routine. And creating a detail guide for configuring some testing server is a possible way to do it. However I'd
prefer to try to develop a simple local test server that is easy to
configure. I believe that it will cover most of cases.

And I assume that there may be a number of sophisticated test cases that
requires a special server set up. But I'd place them separately this was
discussed in '[testing] code for exotic configurations' topic.

Otherwise there is a chance to get the following detailed instructions:
1) Download http server from http://www.apache.org
...
50) Do this and that
...
100) Now you can run net tests

Thanks,
Stepan


On 2/22/06, Richard Liang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Dears,
Agree that server (maybe not local) is required for some sophisticated
test cases. To make thing simply, we may provide more detail guide
(step-by-step) on how to setup/configure a typical testing server. Or
shall we setup a test server and allow user to share our testing server?

Richard Liang
China Software Development Lab, IBM



Tim Ellison wrote:
Stepan Mishura wrote:

I glanced through a local server code from HARMONY-57 contribution
without
looking into implementation details and ... this made me think. I catch
hold
of the following:
1) The server contains some testing code that looks not good for me

Care to explain?


2) It is not as simple as I expected - my impression was that a local
server
implementation should be very simple because we are not going to test
whether it corresponds to http spec. or not. IMHO, it should only
provide a
test case with:
- a port number to open communication
- access to a server's input/output streams to verify a request to a
server
or to form a server's response.
Naive? Well, I'm aware that I'm not so experienced in java.netdevelopment
and testing and may be I'm wrong.

The local server I referenced can be used for a number of the java.net
tests, some of which do require more sophisticated behavior, like basic
authentication, eTags, etc.

I agree that the tests in HARMONY-71 only need something to accept their
connection, but I was simply pointing out that there will be a local
server we can use if that contribution is accepted into the project, so
probably not worth writing another.


I'd like to start with the first issue (BTW, is it ok to discuss
details of
contribution implementation if it is not accepted yet?).

Sure -- I would expect people to be evaluating it thoroughly so that
they can vote the code in/out.  The PPMC will shout early if the
paperwork implies a contribution is unacceptable.


Can we avoid adding
a code that is specific for some test case to a local server?

Does it interfere with what you want to do?
In some cases, the test case needs to know what is on the server a
priori, so that it can test the client behavior correctly.

Regards,
Tim


On 2/16/06, Tim Ellison wrote:

I would rather that you just opened a new JIRA issue for that as it
doesn't relate to the original problem.

FYI there is a local server incoming in the HARMONY-57 contribution,
so
don't spend any time on it, see:


<HARMONY-57>\Harmony\Harmony_Tests\src\test\java\tests\support\Support_HttpServer.java
Regards,
Tim

Stepan Mishura (JIRA) wrote:

    [

http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-71?page=comments#action_12366637
]
Stepan Mishura commented on HARMONY-71:
---------------------------------------

Tim,

Added test case (test_setUseCachesZ) depends on network and it fails
if
it can not create connection with apache.org. The same for HARMONY-72.
I'm
going to attach a patch file with a local server in it. Could you
reopen
this JIRA?

Thanks,
Stepan.


 java.net.URLConnection.setUseCaches throws unspecified

IllegalAccessError

--------------------------------------------------------------------------
         Key: HARMONY-71
         URL: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/HARMONY-71
     Project: Harmony
        Type: Bug
  Components: Classlib
    Reporter: Svetlana Samoilenko
    Assignee: Tim Ellison
According to j2se 1.4.2 specification method

java.net.URLConnection.setUseCaches(boolean) throws
IllegalStateException,
if already connected. Harmony throws java.lang.IllegalAccessErrorinstead,
that contradicts the specification.

Code to reproduce:
import java.io.IOException;
import java.net.*;
public class test2 {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        HttpURLConnection u=null;
        try {
            u=(HttpURLConnection)(new URL("http://intel.com

").openConnection());

            u.connect();
        } catch (MalformedURLException e) {
            System.out.println("unexpected
MalformedURLException"+e);
        } catch (IOException f) {
            System.out.println("unexpected IOException"+f);
        }
        try {
           u.setUseCaches(true);
        } catch (IllegalStateException e) {
System.out.println("OK. Expected IllegalStateException");
           e.printStackTrace();
        };
    }
}
Steps to Reproduce:
1. Build Harmony (check-out on 2006-01-30) j2se subset as described
in
README.txt.

2. Compile test2.java using BEA 1.4 javac

javac -d . test2.java

3. Run java using compatible VM (J9)

java -showversion test2

Output:
C:\tmp>C:\jrockit-j2sdk1.4.2_04\bin\java.exe -showversion test2
java version "1.4.2_04"
Java(TM) 2 Runtime Environment, Standard Edition (build 1.4.2_04-b05
)
BEA WebLogic JRockit(TM) 1.4.2_04 JVM (build

ari-31788-20040616-1132-win-ia32, Native Threads, GC strategy:
parallel)
OK. Expected IllegalStateException
java.lang.IllegalStateException: Already connected
        at java.net.URLConnection.setUseCaches(Z)V(
URLConnection.java
:828)

        at test2.main([Ljava.lang.String;)V(test2.java:17)
C:\tmp>C:\harmony\trunk\deploy\jre\bin\java -showversion test2
(c) Copyright 1991, 2005 The Apache Software Foundation or its

licensors, as applicable.

java.lang.IllegalAccessError: Connection already established
        at java.net.URLConnection.setUseCaches(URLConnection.java
:923)
        at test2.main(test2.java:17)
Suggested junit test case:
------------------------
URLConnectionTest.java-------------------------------------------------
import java.io.IOException;
import java.net.*;
import junit.framework.*;
public class URLConnectionTest extends TestCase {
    public static void main(String[] args) {
        junit.textui.TestRunner.run(URLConnectionTest.class);
    }
    public void test_setUseCaches () {
        HttpURLConnection u=null;
        try {
            u=(HttpURLConnection)(new URL("http://intel.com

").openConnection());

            u.connect();
        } catch (MalformedURLException e) {
            fail("unexpected MalformedURLException"+e);
        } catch (IOException f) {
            fail("unexpected IOException"+f);
        }
        try {
           u.setUseCaches(true);
        } catch (IllegalStateException e) { //expected
        };
   }
}

--

Tim Ellison ([EMAIL PROTECTED])
IBM Java technology centre, UK.






--
Thanks,
Stepan Mishura
Intel Middleware Products Division



Reply via email to