Jimmy, Jing Lv wrote:
One day, with Harmony spreading all over the world, I don't want to
hear anyone saying: "Woo, who's that guy writing these tests named
'test1,test2,test3', it takes me a lot of time on understanding them,
No one's advocating that, so please put that straw-man back whereever it
came from.
even a mid-school student can do better than this!"
I agreed that our naming convention must:
1. make it understandable for everyone, what does this method try to do,
or at least contain a hint (most important)
2. easy to distinguish if there are some similar ones
3. as short/easy as possible for people to read
Any comments?
Yes.
test<SomethingUsefulWithMaybeANumberIfItsOverloadedWhereYouUseYourGoodJudgement>
or
test<SomethingThatYouWouldLikeToEncounterIfYouWereReadingCodeForFirstTime>
but not
test<SomethingDogmaticJustForSakeOfDogma>
:)
geir
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
