I agree with Geir. It's a good idea to keep classlib and vm people aware of what the others are doing. Sometimes, issues that might seem unrelated by classlib or vm people might actually affect the other group. I much prefer the suggested [topic] approach.
Etienne Magnusson, Geir wrote: > I've thought about it, but I think that it's a bit premature. Why? > Because I think that once we fracture the list traffic, we lose a lot of > the intermixing that's important. > > I think once we have a lot more VM traffic, it makes perfect sense. > > However, I think that as an intermediate step though we should all work > very hard to tag our subject lines with a [topic] :) -- Etienne M. Gagnon, Ph.D. http://www.info2.uqam.ca/~egagnon/ SableVM: http://www.sablevm.org/ SableCC: http://www.sablecc.org/
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
