On 4/26/06, Mikhail Loenko <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Seems like implemantation-specific tests for java.security package do not > fit well into the proposed solution > > I think we do not have to stick to requirement about > organization name in the tests: we already have tests in package java.* > why don't have package tests.*?
+1. The smaller and obvious package names we have the easier to navigate. "tests.*" looks very obvious and small. Wishes, -- Anton Avtamonov, Intel Middleware Products Division --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
