Geir, The problem is that no one yet suggested a consistent solution that would fit for all the tests and would not get into packages like
org.apache.harmony.security.tests.org.apache.harmony.security.util Everybody seems to agree that SOME implementation specific tests are in the same package as implementation. But if we have ALL the tests in the same package as implementation, then we can't run e.g. tests against java.beans.Beans from classpath, so we can't run regression test for HARMONY-358 The question is where we put 'classpath' test. If we put them into o.a.h.module.tests.[package under test] we result in that ugly package names like o.a.h.security.tests.o.a.h.security.util Thanks, Mikhail 2006/4/27, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > > > > George Harley wrote: > >> > >> Of course, the text module has only "implementation-independent tests > >> that designed to be run from classpath". For modules that have got > >> implementation-specific tests then I suppose we could use something > >> like "org.apache.harmony.[module].tests.impl.[package under test]" or > >> "org.apache.harmony.[module].tests.internal.[package under test]" etc. > >> I've got no preference. > > > > -1 > > > > Put them in the same package as the class being tested, please, if there > > is no problem being run that way. > > Sorry to be so snippy. Been a long day. > > Why would we want this convoluted package name? Why wouldn't we want to > let them be in the same package as the class being tested since it's > implementation testing? > > geir > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
