Paulex, we have at least 8 categories of tests: running from classpath or bootclasspath implementation specific or independent testing org.apache.harmony.* or java.* Could you please list how all the tests will be named
Thanks, Mikhail 2006/4/27, Paulex Yang <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > Mikhail Loenko wrote: > > Geir, > > > > The problem is that no one yet suggested a consistent solution > > that would fit for all the tests and would not get into packages like > > > > org.apache.harmony.security.tests.org.apache.harmony.security.util > > > > > > Everybody seems to agree that SOME implementation specific tests are > > in the same package as implementation. > > > > But if we have ALL the tests in the same package as implementation, > > then we can't run e.g. tests against java.beans.Beans from classpath, so > > we can't run regression test for HARMONY-358 > > > > The question is where we put 'classpath' test. If we put them into > > o.a.h.module.tests.[package under test] we result in that ugly package > > names like > > o.a.h.security.tests.o.a.h.security.util > > > Mikhail, > > Why my prior proposal that o.a.h.security.tests.impl.util is unacceptable? > > And I have no objection if "impl" considered redundant, too. > > > Thanks, > > Mikhail > > > > > > 2006/4/27, Geir Magnusson Jr <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>: > > > >> Geir Magnusson Jr wrote: > >> > >>> George Harley wrote: > >>> > >> >> > >> > >>>> Of course, the text module has only "implementation-independent tests > >>>> that designed to be run from classpath". For modules that have got > >>>> implementation-specific tests then I suppose we could use something > >>>> like "org.apache.harmony.[module].tests.impl.[package under test]" or > >>>> "org.apache.harmony.[module].tests.internal.[package under test]" etc. > >>>> I've got no preference. > >>>> > >>> -1 > >>> > >>> Put them in the same package as the class being tested, please, if there > >>> is no problem being run that way. > >>> > >> Sorry to be so snippy. Been a long day. > >> > >> Why would we want this convoluted package name? Why wouldn't we want to > >> let them be in the same package as the class being tested since it's > >> implementation testing? > >> > >> geir > >> > >> --------------------------------------------------------------------- > >> Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > >> To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > >> > >> > >> > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > > > > -- > Paulex Yang > China Software Development Lab > IBM > > > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- > Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html > To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > > --------------------------------------------------------------------- Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED] For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]