Etienne Gagnon wrote:
Hi Anton,
Are you proposing that all Harmony JVMs must abide by the OPEN proposal?
I won't attempt to speak for Anton, but IMO, "no".
Right now, any JVM that works w/ Harmony classlib must simply support
the class library's virtual machine interface.
If yes, I think that some process has to be put in place to present and
discuss each of this proposal's part, and dedicate time to do so. IMO,
I don't think that everyone (in the JVM sub-communityof Harmony) can
simply read through this proposal and be able to make an enlightened
decision about it. I think that each point would gain much from being
presented along the motivation behind it.
Yes, I think that we'll need lots of discussion around this proposal.
In the future, can we prefix subject lines related to this with [OPEN]
or such so poeple interested in the subject can easily identify threads
related to it?
geir
---------------------------------------------------------------------
Terms of use : http://incubator.apache.org/harmony/mailing.html
To unsubscribe, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
For additional commands, e-mail: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
